Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Blog post for December 1-3

This week, review the chronology of films and events from 1940-1945 in Rentschler's Appendix. Find one event, film, industry event, or political happening to explore however you like. If you respond to a film, please post on the film blog; otherwise, please post on the reading blog.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Münchhausen

Either take issue with Rentschler's reading of some scene in Münchhausen (1943), or discuss the operation of the film's narrative framing device.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

November 10-12: Hangmen also Die

Who is the victim in "Hangmen also Die"?

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Silberman Article on "Romance in a Minor Key"

Respond to some aspect of the Silberman article. Do you agree or disagree with his point? Interpret his point, using other articles or the film to support your argument.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Jew Suss and the Eternal Jew

Compare the drama Jew Suss and the "documentary" Eternal Jew as historical documents (both are products from 1940/41; both make claims about history). How can we use them today to gain insight into Nazi perspectives?

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

October 13-15: La Habanera

Identify and defend your categorization of the film's hero, either Don Pedro or Sven Nagel. Think about the different ways each character is presented, cast, shot. Take the complexity of each character into account when making your argument. One option would be to pick a scene and discuss how it functions for the audience. Consider how lighting, sound, and the edition of shots function, including how they seem to represent specific cultural values.

If you prefer, you can instead tease out problem points, where you believe the scene to change shots, perspectives. Be sure to also make use of the actual film: lighting, editing choices. It may be productive to think of the film in terms of things which are not included.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

October 6-8: The Broken Jug

Imagine you were writing a paper on the Broken Jug. How would you address its position as a Nazi film? Some helpful ways of thinking of this question (you do not need to use all of them or any of them!) What categories would you use to answer this question? How does the film associate with Nazi culture? How might you organize your argument?

If you use the Silberman article (on OAK) to help frame your argument, post your answer on the Readings blog. Otherwise, make use of the Films blog.